|
Three stories, three locations, three atmospheres... Or how Simenon has the art of plunging his Chief Inspector into three very different types of "baths", which, each in its way, function to reveal Maigret's way of working...
The first of these stories, Death Penalty, tells us the story of a "tail", in which the Chief Inspector applies himself to following a suspect, badgering him without seeming to, like a monolithic block, taciturn as his creator sometimes describes him, especially in the Fayard cycle (see for example Maigret and the Enigmatic Lett [LET], where, there too, Maigret stays on Pietr's trail, from Fécamp to the Majestic): always on the heels of the suspect, an implacable mass, like "certain certain characters of a child's nightmare... who advance on the sleeper as if to crush him" ([Maigret and the Hundred Gibbets [PHO]), he stays there, awaiting the "slip" which will topple the suspect, the false step which will constitute a confession. The atmosphere of this story, and the Maigret described therein, evoke for me exactly Maigret and the Hundred Gibbets, and, as if by chance (though certainly not...), the denouement of the plot will come in Brussels, like that of the Hundred Gibbets in Liège, as if Maigret's "weight" was even heavier in Belgium...
The second story, Death of a Woodlander, plunges us into a completely different milieu, that which is sometimes called "deep France"... in a hamlet lost deep in the Orléans forest, where they live almost as if in the 19th century, it's a story of family hatred... even sharper for its being shared by two sisters, and at its base a story of money – such as Simenon has described in more than one novel, and also in the non-Maigrets> (see also the story Le deuil de Fonsine. Two sisters who had always lived together, but one had had a lover and the other not, and the hatred was all the stronger as the child of that love "profited" from the shared assets of the two sisters. A plan of vengeance, well mixed with hatred, had almost succeeded, but Maigret, who knows how to swim like a fish in the troubled waters of smoldering grudges, soon discovers the truth. And "soon" is hardly an exaggeration, since he had simply to see a drawing of the scene of the crime, to understand what had taken place. Born in the country, "of peasant stock" as they say in the story, he knew the ways of the village... He knew so well that here, no need for long ruminations, long interrogations... a little candle wax on a wine cask, and with a handsaw Maigret cuts to the quick...
The third story, In the Rue Pigalle, brings us back to Paris, in a district well known to the Chief Inspector, that of Montmartre. It's in the milieu of "punks" and "gangsters" that Maigret leads his investigation this time. Once more, it's not a question here of gathering physical evidence, or coming up with brilliant logical deductions, but of impregnating himself in an atmosphere, or merging into the ambiance... no forceful intervention, revolver in hand, of an acrobatic policeman, but simply "a heavyset man in a thick overcoat, who smokes his pipe, back to the stove, all the while warming a glass of alcohol in his hand", Maigret in one of his favorite poses, observing the life of a café around him, from time to time making an innocent-sounding remark. For he'd been observing everything without seeming to, for he let his observations settle in, to understand the role of the delivery truck at the building. Simenon, once more, has the art of being able to capture in a phrase the "Maigret method" "But wasn't there also a considerable factor of professional skill, a knowledge of people, and even what's called 'flair'?" The experience of his years as a policeman, his ability to put himself in another's place, his intuition, there in three phrases are what makes Maigret such a special character...
 |
"a heavyset man in a thick overcoat, who smokes his pipe, back to the stove, all the while warming a glass of alcohol in his hand" – Maigret as he is imagined on the cover of the 1964 Fayard edition of The Yellow Dog [JAU]. |
|